"Face surveillance will be used to power discriminatory surveillance and policing that targets communities of colour,immigrants,and activists. Once unleashed,that damage can't be undone."
In response to the test,a spokesperson for Amazon Web Services told the BBC:"We remain excited about how image and video analysis can be a driver for good in the world,including in the public sector and law enforcement."
"With regard to this recent test of Amazon Rekognition by the ACLU,we think that the results could probably be improved by following best practices around setting the confidence thresholds."
Rekognition is touted by Amazon as being useful for a range of things,from detecting offensive content to identifying celebrities.
亞馬遜宣稱Rekognition對于從檢測攻擊性內容到識別名人等一系列事情是大有用處的。
It is also working with some US local law enforcement agencies to implement the system for identifying criminals.
它還與一些美國當地執法機構合作,來實踐識別罪犯的系統。
The 80% accuracy range used by ACLU is the system’s default setting but a spokeswoman for Amazon Web Services told Reuters that,for identifying individuals, it recommended setting a threshold of 95% or higher.
According to ACLU,nearly 40% of the system’s false matches were for black Congress members,even though they make up only 20% of the legislature.
據ACLU稱,該系統近40%的錯誤匹配是針對黑人國會議員的,盡管他們只占立法機構的20%。
Among those being wrongly identified was civil rights leader John Lewis,who is a member of the Congressional Black Caucus.
被錯誤識別的是民權領袖約翰·劉易斯,他是國會黑人核心小組的成員。
That group recently wrote to Amazon chief executive Jeff Bezos expressing concerns about the "profound negative unintended consequences" facial recognition systems could have for black people.
"Congress should press for a federal moratorium on the use of face surveillance until its harms,particularly to vulnerable communities,are fully considered,"said ACLU’s legislative counsel Neema Singh Guliani.
"The public deserves a full debate about how and if face surveillance should be used."
“公眾應該就如何以及是否應該使用面部監測進行充分辯論。”
In the UK,lawyers for civil liberties group Big Brother Watch have launched a legal challenge against the use of automatic facial recognition technology by police.